EFF: If It Doesn’t Have Paper Backups and Automatic Audits, It’s Not an Election Security Bill
If It Doesn’t Have Paper Backups and Automatic Audits, It’s Not an Election Security Bill Right now, the U.S. Senate is debating an issue that’s critical to our democratic future: secure elections. Hacking attacks were used to try to undermine the 2016 U.S. election, and in recent years, elections in Latin America and Ukraine were also subject to cyber attacks. It only makes sense to harden the security of U.S. voting machines, which are perhaps the most direct route to impacting an election’s results. But the current bill that’s advancing in the Senate, the Secure Elections Act , is no solution at all. If it isn’t strengthened dramatically, senators should vote against this deeply flawed bill. The best solution to stop a possible hack of voting machines is clear: all machines must use a paper trail that’s regularly audited. Many states with voting machines already use paper, but more than a dozen are using at least some machines that provide no paper trail. In five stat...