Effective Power Distribution and Asset Monitoring can shelve off losses in Transformer Services

The advent of Connected services has seen a ten fold rise in awareness, acceptance and application mainly part to the IOT phenomenon especially Industrial Internet of Things and home control. In the domain of power distribution, IoT plays an important role by enabling owners of power distribution equipment (e.g., transformers, transfer switches and breakers) to migrate from a reactive and preventive maintenance model, to a condition-based maintenance business model. Practical deployment and feasibility related Information concerning power distribution-related IoT implementations have come to light. Schneider Electric’s Power Distribution and Asset Monitoring-as-a-Service (APM-aaS), a predictive analytics software solution, has been installed at several pilot regions.

The main objectives of Power distribution based Asset Performance Monitoring is to provide insight as to the health of electrical distribution assets. The steps executed in the process include the following:

• Gathering of behavioral data through sensors
• Consolidation of collected data via a dashboard
• Monitoring and analysis of that data by power experts.
• Transformation of data to action

 

At the testing locations, medium voltage switchgear, dry type transformers, air circuit breakers, and high voltage oil filled transformers were focused for monitoring and analysis. In addition, wireless temperature and partial discharge technologies were integrated into the platform, and medium and low voltage circuit breakers algorithms were refined.

Sensors were placed inside of the targeted assets in order to gather performance data to help analyze the operating performance of each asset. By leveraging the recent advancements in cloud technologies, data was transferred from the customer’s location to the Schneider Electric data center to analyse optimal power management.

During this process, data was analyzed at three levels. At the first level, analysis was performed through asset specific algorithms, combined with rules and thresholds specific to asset application and utilization. The second level consisted of remote analysts located at a centralized service bureau who were responsible for day-to- day operations and for the initial anomaly discovery process. The third level engaged a network of experts, either product line or system experts, who further validated the findings, and developed a detailed report along with recommended next steps. The findings were submitted to the pilot customers, with a detailed action plan to address all findings.

At one pilot site, the team applied a wireless temperature technology on two dry-type transformers supporting a double-ended substation, which featured a Main-Tie-Main configuration. One side was supplied by a 4-year old transformer and the adjacent transformer, which was part of the original installation, had been in service for approximately 30 years.

Two weeks after monitoring began, it was observed that the heat signature of the two transformers were quite different. The newer transformer, displayed a very tight temperature profile, with “B” phase being the higher temperature of the three phases. The older transformer displayed a heat signature that was quite different. The temperature disparity between the phases was greater. Analysts observed that “C” phase was running hotter than A and B. Typically, on a dry-type transformer, if load is balanced, “B” phase temperature should be hotter than “A” & “B” due to its physical location.

After some investigation with the customer, it was deemed that load was not the cause of the higher than expected temperature of the “C” phase, and no other contributing factors could explain the higher temperature of “C” phase. As analysts researched the history of the transformer, it was discovered that an identically configured transformer, 4 years’ prior, had been replaced because of a catastrophic failure caused by a coil short circuit leading to huge scale activities undertaken for power factor correction and maintenance. The lost revenue, clean up, and replacement costs were estimated to be in the vicinity of $1 Million.

It was deemed by the expert analyst that the heat trend within the older transformer was a possible warning that the insulation inside was beginning to deteriorate. Faulty insulation can lead to short circuit issues. The report produced by the Asset Performance Monitoring team, which was based on the data gathered, was enough to convince the customer’s management team to upgrade to a new transformer, thereby avoiding a repeat scenario of catastrophic transformer loss.

It is one of the use cases in demonstrating how predictive maintenance, based on an IoT configured solution, can significantly remove undesired disruption to business continuity and the associated financial losses. Predictive maintenance and its instrumental offerings play an important role in field services and its executional evaluation. This is how an optimal evaluation, management, monitoring and analysis helps industries to settle their financial books in the green and make sure that their operations in power distribution and asset management remains sustainable and profitable.

The post Effective Power Distribution and Asset Monitoring can shelve off losses in Transformer Services appeared first on Schneider Electric Blog.

Visit Toronto Wiring
from Schneider Electric Blog

Visit Toronto Wiring